PDF Ebook The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris
A book is much pertaining to reading activities. Reserve will be nothing when none reads it. Reviewing will certainly not be completed when the book is one of the subjects. Nevertheless, in this modern-day age, the existence of book is growing sophisticatedly. Lots of sources make the both book in published and also soft data. Having the soft documents of publication will certainly reduce you making actual to read it. It can be conserved in your different gadget, computer system, CD, laptop computer, also the gizmo that you constantly bring almost everywhere. It is why; we show you the soft documents of The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris as one of matter to check out.
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris
PDF Ebook The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris When creating can change your life, when composing can enrich you by offering much cash, why do not you try it? Are you still really baffled of where getting the ideas? Do you still have no idea with just what you are visiting write? Currently, you will require reading The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris A great writer is a good user simultaneously. You can define exactly how you create depending on just what books to read. This The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris could aid you to fix the problem. It can be one of the ideal resources to create your creating skill.
Keep your means to be right here as well as read this resource finished. You could delight in browsing the book The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris that you really describe get. Right here, obtaining the soft file of the book The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris can be done effortlessly by downloading in the link page that we offer here. Obviously, the The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris will be all yours faster. It's no should await the book The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris to obtain some days later on after purchasing. It's no have to go outside under the warms at middle day to visit guide establishment.
Downloading the book The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris in this web site listings can make you much more benefits. It will reveal you the most effective book collections as well as finished compilations. A lot of publications can be discovered in this website. So, this is not just this The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris Nonetheless, this book is described read considering that it is a motivating book to provide you more opportunity to get experiences and ideas. This is straightforward, review the soft file of the book The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris as well as you get it.
In getting this The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris, you may not constantly go by walking or riding your electric motors to the book establishments. Obtain the queuing, under the rain or very hot light, as well as still hunt for the unidentified publication to be because book shop. By seeing this page, you can only look for the The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris and also you can locate it. So currently, this moment is for you to opt for the download web link as well as acquisition The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris as your very own soft documents publication. You could read this book The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris in soft documents only and also wait as yours. So, you do not need to fast place guide The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, By Sam Harris into your bag anywhere.
Review
“Sam Harris breathes intellectual fire into an ancient debate. Reading this thrilling, audacious book, you feel the ground shifting beneath your feet. Reason has never had a more passionate advocate.” —Ian McEwanBeautifully written as they were (the elegance of his prose is a distilled blend of honesty and clarity) there was little in Sam Harris's previous books that couldn't have been written by any of his fellow 'horsemen' of the 'new atheism'. This book is different, though every bit as readable as the other two. I was one of those who had unthinkingly bought into the hectoring myth that science can say nothing about morals. To my surprise, "The Moral Landscape" has changed all that for me. It should change it for philosophers too. Philosophers of mind have already discovered that they can't duck the study of neuroscience, and the best of them have raised their game as a result. Sam Harris shows that the same should be true of moral philosophers, and it will turn their world exhilaratingly upside down. As for religion, and the preposterous idea that we need God to be good, nobody wields a sharper bayonet than Sam Harris. --Richard Dawkins“Reading Sam Harris is like drinking water from a cool stream on a hot day. He has the rare ability to frame arguments that are not only stimulating, they are downright nourishing, even if you don’t always agree with him! In this new book he argues from a philosophical and a neurobiological perspective that science can and should determine morality. His discussions will provoke secular liberals and religious conservatives alike, who jointly argue from different perspectives that there always will be an unbridgeable chasm between merely knowing what is and discerning what should be. As was the case with Harris’ previous books, readers are bound to come away with previously firm convictions about the world challenged, and a vital new awareness about the nature and value of science and reason in our lives.” "—"Lawrence M. Krauss, Foundation Professor and Director of the ASU Origins Project at Arizona State University," "author of" The Physics of Star Trek,“A lively, provocative, and timely new look at one of the deepest problems in the world of ideas. Harris makes a powerful case for a morality that is based on human flourishing and thoroughly enmeshed with science and rationality. It is a tremendously appealing vision, and one that no thinking person can afford to ignore.” --Steven Pinker, Harvard College Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and author of How the Mind Works and The Blank Slate."A lively, provocative, and timely new look at one of the deepest problems in the world of ideas. Harris makes a powerful case for a morality that is based on human flourishing and thoroughly enmeshed with science and rationality. It is a tremendously appealing vision, and one that no thinking person can afford to ignore." --Steven Pinker, Harvard College Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and author of How the Mind Works and The Blank Slate."Sam Harris breathes intellectual fire into an ancient debate. Reading this thrilling, audacious book, you feel the ground shifting beneath your feet. Reason has never had a more passionate advocate." --Ian McEwan"Reading Sam Harris is like drinking water from a cool stream on a hot day. He has the rare ability to frame arguments that are not only stimulating, they are downright nourishing, even if you don't always agree with him! In this new book he argues from a philosophical and a neurobiological perspective that science can and should determine morality. His discussions will provoke secular liberals and religious conservatives alike, who jointly argue from different perspectives that there always will be an unbridgeable chasm between merely knowing what is and discerning what should be. As was the case with Harris' previous books, readers are bound to come away with previously firm convictions about the world challenged, and a vital new awareness about the nature and value of science and reason in our lives.""--"Lawrence M. Krauss, Foundation Professor and Director of the ASU Origins Project at Arizona State University", "author of" The Physics of Star Trek, " and", Quantum Man: Richard Feynman's Life in Science "
Read more
About the Author
Sam Harris is the author of the bestselling books The End of Faith, Letter to a Christian Nation, The Moral Landscape, Free Will, and Lying. The End of Faith won the 2005 PEN Award for Nonfiction. His writing has been published in over fifteen languages. Dr. Harris is cofounder and CEO of Project Reason, a nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. He received a degree in philosophy from Stanford University and a PhD in neuroscience from UCLA. Please visit his website at SamHarris.org.
Read more
Product details
Paperback: 320 pages
Publisher: Free Press; Reprint edition (September 13, 2011)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 9781439171226
ISBN-13: 978-1439171226
ASIN: 143917122X
Product Dimensions:
5.5 x 0.7 x 8.4 inches
Shipping Weight: 9.1 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.2 out of 5 stars
599 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#17,329 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Sam Harris, you are not a philosopher, so stop calling yourself one. You have no advanced degree in academic philosophy. You are merely a petty ideologue, talking head, and writer of popular books on subjects of which you have proven yourself unable to speak credibly, not a philosopher. The crux of your "Moral Landscape" is, in fact, a highly derivative retread of the same tired schtick uttered by 19th century positivists, in adherence to a set of philosophical premises that have never held under close scrutiny, and which has suffered withering critique at the hands of such noted and influential academic philosophers as G.E. Moore, among others. Real philosophers don't simply ignore the work of their predecessors, especially when doing so entails a complete failure to interact credibly with the strongest arguments against one's central thesis. The only thing you've succeeded in proving, Mr. Harris, is that a PhD in neuroscience qualifies one to speak as an authority in the field of philosophy about as much as a B.A. in hotel and restaurant management.
We can fantasize about "maximizing the well-being of conscious creatures" (have you become a Vegan yet?) or we can "maximize human flourishing" (whatever that is ... McMansions?). But this moral landscape is a woolly, unproductive metaphor. He basically seems to have taken the "Climbing Mount Improbable" idea and flung it like so much pizza dough at morality. There isn't an agreeable way to define the peaks, much less calculate, compare, or traverse them. The author consistently points to situations of near-universal agreement "Nazis were wrong", and leaves it to our imaginations to infer that there is an optimum course of action.Harris wants his consequentialism to be propped up by science. But, as he admits, most scientists don't think his project is science. And, as he has referenced Paul Slovic's work - that moral intuition doesn't scale with number - he should understand that our morality isn't suited to the general maximization of well-being for conscious creatures. Instead, Dr. Harris actually called this aspect of our moral intuition a bug, not a feature! How good of him to choose what is and is not moral for us. He rejects the "is" of morality as it exists observationally (i.e. actual science) and replaces it with his preferential "ought" - and that is neither good science nor good philosophy. With degrees in each, he should know better.His whole approach seems philosophical in nature, and yet (as far as I can tell), he has completely skipped serious philosophical participation. Just as creationists and IDers want to skip actual science and the peer review process to "teach the controversy" to gullible high school kids; Harris wants to skip peer-reviewed science and philosophy and sell books to wannabe intellectuals, newly-minted atheists, and hopeful moral realists. Did you catch that?? Atheists, myself included, unanimously say that intelligent design advocates should prove that their endeavor is scientific and should make their progress through peer-reviewed journals. Where is the analagous peer-reviewed literature from Sam Harris?So that's what I don't like, but there are a couple of things I do like. First, his work suggests that the moral realist should "put up or shut up". Sadly, I don't think either outcome will transpire, but it's a nice thought. And secondly, Dr. Harris doesn't seem overly obsessed with religion when it comes to this topic. (Nothing is sadder than the atheist who squanders the rest of his days learning about, arguing against, and spitting towards that which he has gained freedom from. Fly away and be free, for Christ's sake!!) Yes, that was merely a parenthetical remark. :)My suggestion: Go to YouTube and watch two hours of free videos featuring Dr. Harris presenting and defending his ideas for "A New Science of Morality". Armed with this information, and with the salient points of both favorable and unfavorable reviews, you will make an informed decision.(note: I did not subtract a star for the excessive price of the Kindle version)
In the Moral Landscape, Harris makes an astounding claim, fails to back it up, and then whines when critics point it out.I was provoked to read the book by its subtitle -- "How Science Can Determine Human Values." I immediately thought that this simply could not be, and I was hardly alone. In the afterword, which is included in the book's paperback and Kindle versions, Harris acknowledges this has been the predominant criticism and he calls those who make it "myopic." His point, presumably, is that the book has so much more to offer.Put simply, it doesn't. Stripped of its controversial claim, the book can only be read to say that science helps us determine whether moral standards are met. For example, science doesn't say whether punishment ought not be cruel, but it might help us determine whether lethal injection is so. This lowered claim about science's import with respect to morality is not even interesting, much less sensational.To support his analysis, Harris leans too hard on the analogy he draws between morality and health. Health, he points out, has vague boundaries but it is still the subject of scientific study. Harris believes the same is true about morality.By a more typical reckoning, however, morality is fundamentally different from health. At its core, morality is made up of the axioms of ought. Whether doctors should assist some patients to die is not a medical question, but a moral question; science can't answer it. Harris accepts in the afterward that there are certain moral axioms. In fact he proffers one by suggesting morality is primarily about the flourishing of sentient beings. However, he fails to recognize that these axioms are at morality's heart and put the subject beyond the scope of science.
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris PDF
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris EPub
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris Doc
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris iBooks
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris rtf
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris Mobipocket
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, by Sam Harris Kindle
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar